top of page

Leveling the Playing Field: Dispelling Myths and Promoting Inclusivity for Transgender Athletes

In the realm of sports, the pursuit of equality has always been a challenge, with athletes from marginalized groups fighting for their rightful place on the field. In recent years, the debate surrounding transgender athletes’ participation in sports has intensified, raising questions about fairness, inclusion, and the very definition of gender in athletics.

At the core of the debate lies the misconception that transgender athletes, particularly transgender women, possess an inherent advantage over their cisgender counterparts. However, research suggests otherwise, including a comprehensive review of over 800 studies by the University of Victoria’s Centre for Sport and Sustainability.

Studies have shown that transgender women who have undergone hormone therapy do not hold an athletic advantage over cisgender women. The notion that transgender athletes disrupt the competitive balance is unfounded and often stems from societal biases rather than scientific evidence.

Moreover, transgender athletes face significant barriers to participation in sports. A 2016 study by the National Center for Transgender Equality found that 22% of transgender people had been harassed or mistreated while participating in sports, and 15% had been denied the opportunity to play on a sports team because of their gender identity.

Instead of perpetuating unfounded fears, the focus should shift towards fostering inclusivity and ensuring fairness for all athletes. As highlighted by a 2019 study by the Human Rights Campaign, inclusive sports policies can create a more supportive environment for athletes of all gender identities.

Excluding transgender athletes based on unfounded claims of unfair advantage not only harms these individuals but also undermines the very principles of sportsmanship and equality. As a 2020 study by the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport emphasizes, policies that exclude transgender athletes lack evidence and can have detrimental effects on their well-being.

The world of sports should be where everyone feels welcomed and empowered to compete, regardless of gender identity. By debunking myths, embracing inclusivity, and promoting evidence-based policies, we can create a level playing field where all athletes can excel and celebrate the true spirit of sportsmanship.

Caster Semenya does not identify as intersex.

Caster Semenya, the accomplished South African Olympic runner, found herself at the epicentre of a contentious debate regarding her elevated testosterone levels. This saga commenced in 2009 after her remarkable victory in the 800 meters at the World Athletics Championships. In response, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), now known as World Athletics, initiated a series of sex verification tests. These tests disclosed Semenya’s hyperandrogenism, a condition characterized by naturally elevated testosterone levels.

“For me, participating in a third category of human gender identity would be accepting being othered, accepting the discrimination that I had fought against,” she writes. “It would mean giving up the identity I’d been born with and had never questioned to take on a new one I didn’t believe.”

“Even though I understand that those in the medical community call me an intersex person because of the way my internal organs are structured,” she continues, “I do not call myself intersex. That identity doesn’t fit me; it doesn’t fit my soul.”

In 2011, the IAAF introduced a stringent policy that imposed restrictions on permissible testosterone levels for female athletes. Those surpassing the defined threshold faced the option of medically reducing their testosterone levels or undergoing surgical interventions, such as the removal of internal testes, to remain eligible for female category competition.

Semenya challenged the IAAF’s policy, contending that it constituted discrimination and infringed upon her fundamental human rights. Regrettably, in 2019, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) upheld the policy, deeming it necessary for maintaining equitable competition and asserting that the benefits outweighed any potential drawbacks.

This controversy has given rise to a multitude of intricate questions, including:

1. The very definition of “sex” as it applies to the realm of sports.

2. The delicate balance between ensuring fair competition and safeguarding athletes' rights.

3. The optimal approach to addressing athletes with medical conditions like hyperandrogenism.

Beyond these fundamental questions, the Semenya case has taken on broader significance, emblematic of more extensive discussions regarding gender and identity. Some argue that the IAAF’s policy discriminates against athletes whose physical characteristics don’t conform to traditional gender norms. In contrast, others insist preserving the fairness of women’s sports is imperative.

Semenya has remained steadfast, declining medical interventions to reduce her testosterone levels and continuing to compete in the female category. She has achieved numerous victories, including gold medals in the 800 meters at the 2016 and 2020 Olympic Games.

In 2022, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) delivered a pivotal verdict, deeming the IAAF’s testosterone policy discriminatory and a violation of Semenya’s human rights. The ECHR mandated that the IAAF compensate Semenya and reassess its testosterone policy.

Presently, the IAAF is in the process of revising its testosterone policy, marking an uncertain chapter for Semenya and other athletes facing the challenges associated with hyperandrogenism.

Follow The Money

The availability of dollars for promotion in sports varies significantly by gender. Men’s sports generally receive far more funding and attention than women’s. This disparity is evident in both professional and amateur athletics.

In professional sports, male athletes earn much higher salaries than female athletes. For example, in 2022, the average salary for a male NBA player was $7.5 million, while the average salary for a WNBA player was just $120,648. This gap is even wider in other sports, such as soccer, where the average male player in Major League Soccer earns over $400,000 per year. In comparison, the average female National Women’s Soccer League player earns just $35,000 per year.

This disparity in funding also extends to amateur sports. For example, in the United States, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits sex discrimination in education programs and activities that receive federal financial assistance. This includes athletics, and as a result, schools are required to provide equal opportunities for male and female athletes. However, despite this law, there is still a significant gap in funding for men’s and women’s sports at the collegiate level. In 2020, the average Division I men’s basketball team had an operating budget of $14.7 million, while the average Division I women’s basketball team had an operating budget of just $5.4 million.

There are several reasons for this disparity in funding. One reason is that men’s sports are generally more popular than women’s. This is partly because men’s sports have been around for longer and have had more time to develop a fan base. Additionally, men’s sports are often more physically demanding and, therefore, more exciting to watch.

Another reason for the disparity in funding is fewer opportunities for women to participate in sports. This is due in part to the fact that there are fewer professional and amateur leagues for women. Additionally, there are often fewer scholarships available for female athletes.

As a result of this disparity in funding, women’s sports often receive less media coverage than men’s sports. This is partly due to the fact that less money is available to promote women’s sports. Additionally, there are fewer female sports journalists.

The lack of media coverage for women’s sports makes it difficult for female athletes to attract sponsors. This is because sponsors are less likely to invest in athletes who are not well-known. As a result, female athletes often have to rely on other sources of income, such as working part-time jobs.

The disparity in funding for men’s and women’s sports has several negative consequences. One consequence is that it makes it more difficult for women to succeed in sports. This is because women have fewer opportunities to train and compete at a high level. Additionally, women often work harder than men to get the same recognition.

Another consequence of the disparity in funding is that it sends a message to young girls that they are not as valued as boys. This can discourage girls from participating in sports and can have a negative impact on their self-esteem.

Several things can be done to address the disparity in funding for men’s and women’s sports. One thing is to increase the number of opportunities for women to participate in sports. This can be done by creating more professional and amateur leagues for women. Additionally, more scholarships should be made available for female athletes.

Another thing that can be done is increasing media coverage of women’s sports. This can be done by investing more money in promoting women’s sports. Additionally, more female sports journalists should be hired.

Finally, it is essential to change how society views women’s sports. This can be done by educating people about the importance of women’s sports and challenging the stereotypes about female athletes.

Additional Material:


After more than 25 years of dedicated leadership in the corporate, feminist, and LGBTQ+ realms, with a profound commitment to LGBTQ+ and women’s rights, I stand ready to support, consult, educate, and advise on your next diversity challenge. Your journey towards inclusivity begins with a conversation. Reach out to me at with any inquiries.

19 views0 comments


bottom of page